Soy composite materials comprising an amino resin and methods of making the same

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides composite materials derived from aqueous binder compositions comprising defatted soy flour of no greater than 43 micron mesh particle size, polymer particles of at least one emulsion (co)polymer, one or more amino resin, and, optionally, one or more reducing sugar. Also provided are methods of making and using composite materials containing the binder compositions.

This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/284,957 filed on Dec. 29, 2009.

The present invention relates to composite materials and methods of making the same. In particular, the present invention relates to flexible composite material comprising a substrate material and a cured or dried binder composition, wherein the cured or dried binder composition is produced from an aqueous binder composition comprising defatted soy flour as the major component, one or more emulsion (co)polymer, one or more amino resin, and, optionally, one or more reducing sugar; and methods for making the same. The composite materials may find use in flexible applications, for example, in glass mats for roofing shingles.

The preparation of composite materials, for example, fiber structures (e.g., non-woven fiber insulation) and shaped articles (e.g., fiberboard and chipboard) are conventionally made using urea-formaldehyde (UF) resins, phenol-formaldehyde (PF) resins, or phenol-formaldehyde resins extended with urea (PFU). Commercial binders have generally been designed to afford a binder that when cured is substantially rigid. For example, in fiberglass insulation binders, the cured binder allows the insulation to be compressed, but have rigidity that allows the compressed insulation to recover substantially to its original shape once compressive forces are removed. Accordingly, the insulation may be shipped in a rolled, compressed state and unrolled before installation to release the compression, and allow a fluffy, heat-insulating mat to be installed. Fiberglass non-wovens made with a binder consisting essentially of an amino resin, most commonly a urea formaldehyde resin, often are brittle. Moreover, the strength properties of the mats may deteriorate appreciably subsequent to their preparation, especially when the mats are subjected to wet conditions. For other applications, known rigid binders are undesirable. For thin fiberglass or polyester mats for use in roofing, the mats are held together with a binder that allows the mat to flex substantially after the binder is cured, and allows the end product containing the mat to flex well in use. For example, in roofing mat, the end roofing product may be impregnated or layered with asphaltic materials, and the resultant roofing product must retain flexibility to allow it to conform to the roof (e.g., bend over peaks and into valleys), and to allow the roofing material to expand and contract with temperature fluctuations, without the mat itself fracturing because it is too brittle and lacks flexibility. For this reason, UF resin binders have, on occasion, been modified by formulating the UF resin with cross-linkers and various catalyst systems or by fortifying the UF resin with latex (emulsion) polymer. Flexible glass mats of this type may find use in a variety of applications, including roofing, flooring underlayments, filtration media, and building products. However, in view of the toxicity of formaldehyde, which is a possible carcinogen, it is desirable to minimize the use of amino resins. In particular, manufacturers desire compositions comprising a majority component of a natural product or a material derived from a natural product.

Existing commercial binders used in composite materials contain a carboxylic acid polymer and a polyol that esterify and form a rigid thermoset when heat cured. However, these binders are not well suited to applications that require some flexibility.

One objective of the present invention is to provide flexible composite materials comprising a substrate material and a cured or dried binder composition, wherein the cured or dried binder composition is produced from an aqueous binder composition which comprises greater than 50 wt. %, based on binder composition solids, of a natural product or a material derived from a natural product, such as defatted soy flour. Natural products have previously been used including soy-based binders used in wood composite structures. Soy isolate or soy concentrate were used because these highly processed forms are largely water soluble under proper pH conditions. However, both are prohibitively expensive and have failed to gain any widespread use as binders for composite materials. Further, whole ground soy bean and defatted soy flour are insoluble in water and difficult to work with.

Composites of defatted soy flour or soy protein isolate with styrene-butadiene latex are disclosed in “Characterization of Defatted Soy Flour and Elastomer Composites”, L. Jong, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 98, 353-361 (2005). L. Jong compares defatted soy flour with soy protein isolate when soy is blended into styrene-butadiene rubber at 10%, 20% and 30% levels in studying the effect of soy as a minor component filler in styrene-butadiene rubbers.

U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0051539, to Kelly, discloses curable binder compositions comprising at least one polycarboxy emulsion copolymer, at least one hydroxyamide crosslinker having at least two hydroxy groups, and at least one extender selected from the group consisting of a polysaccharide or a vegetable protein or mixtures thereof. Kelly discloses that vegetable protein can comprise defatted soy flour. However, the binder compositions disclosed in Kelly would be less suitable for composite materials of the present invention because, at suitable formulation solids levels of 10-25%, or higher, the hydroxyamides raise the viscosity of soy-based binders which may result in poor application during wet-laid mat formation, producing tracks, streaks, or low binder weight (LOI).

The inventor has endeavored to find a solution to the problem of providing composite materials reinforced with an inexpensive thermoset binder that retains both flexibility and strength after cure, and is primarily comprised of a natural product or material derived from a natural product.

STATEMENT OF INVENTION

The present invention provides composite materials comprising: (a) a substrate material; and, (b) a cured or dried binder composition produced from an aqueous binder composition comprising i) polymer particles of at least one emulsion (co)polymer; ii) defatted soy flour of no greater than 43 micron mesh particle size; and iii) one or more amino resin in an amount of no more than 49 wt. %, based on the binder composition solids; wherein the composite material comprises ≦40 wt. % cured or dried binder composition; and, further wherein the binder composition comprises from 51 wt. % to 95 wt. % defatted soy flour, based on the binder composition solids; as well as methods for making the same.

In one embodiment of the invention, the binder composition comprises from 55 wt. % to 85 wt. % defatted soy flour, based on the binder composition solids.

In an embodiment of the invention, the binder composition further comprises one or more reducing sugar. In one such embodiment, the reducing sugar component of the aqueous binder composition is selected from the group consisting of fructose, glyceraldehydes, lactose, arabinose, maltose, glucose, dextrose, xylose, and levulose.

In another embodiment of the invention, the emulsion (co)polymer comprises, in polymerized form, from 5% to 25% by weight, based on the weight of the (co)polymer, of one or more carboxy acid monomer, or anhydride thereof, or salt thereof.

In yet another embodiment of the invention, the emulsion (co)polymer is comprised of from 0.1 to 5 weight percent, based on the weight of the copolymer, of one or more multi-ethylenically unsaturated monomer, in polymerized form. In one such embodiment, the multi-ethylenically unsaturated monomer comprises allylmethacrylate.

In yet still another embodiment of the invention, the defatted soy flour has been subjected to conditions that denature its protein component or formulated to denature its protein content. In another embodiment of the invention, the defatted soy flour is in the form of an aqueous dispersion.

In a different embodiment of the invention, the aqueous binder composition further comprises lignin or derivatives thereof, such as lignosulfonate.

In another different embodiment of the invention, the aqueous binder composition further comprises a thermally generated acid. In one such embodiment, the thermally generated acid is an ammonium salt of an inorganic acid.

In still another different embodiment of the invention, the aqueous binder composition further comprises sodium bisulfite or sodium metabisulfite, preferably at a level of 0.1 to 1 weight percent, based on the weight of the total binder.

In yet another different embodiment of the invention, the aqueous binder composition further comprises one or more crosslinking agent consisting essentially of glycerol, glycerol derivatives, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, pentaerythritol, hydroxy alkyl urea, urea, oxazoline, polyvinyl alcohol, metal ions, such as ions of zirconium or zinc, and mixtures thereof.

In yet still another different embodiment of the invention, the substrate material is selected from the group consisting of: polyester mat, glass reinforcing mat, or microglass based substrate material.

In another aspect, the present invention provides methods for producing a composite material, said method comprising: a) treating a substrate with an aqueous binder composition, b) removing excess binder composition from the substrate, and c) curing or drying the binder composition on the substrate; wherein the aqueous binder composition comprises: i) polymer particles of at least one emulsion (co)polymer; ii) defatted soy flour of no greater than 43 micron mesh particle size; iii) one or more amino resin in an amount of no more than 49 wt. %, based on the binder composition solids; and iv) optionally, one or more reducing sugar; wherein the composite material comprises ≦40 wt. % cured or dried binder composition; and further wherein the binder composition comprises from 51 wt. % to 95 wt. % defatted soy flour, based on the binder composition solids.

In yet another aspect, the present invention provides composite materials for use in applications selected from the group consisting of: roofing, flooring, carpet backing, window treatments, ceiling tiles, wall coverings, roving, printed circuit boards, battery separators, filter stock, tape stock, composite facers, and reinforcement scrim for cementitious or non-cementitious masonry coatings.

In yet still another aspect, the present invention provides composite materials comprising: (a) a substrate material; and, (b) a cured or dried binder composition produced from an aqueous binder composition consisting essentially of: i) polymer particles of at least one emulsion (co)polymer; ii) defatted soy flour of no greater than 43 micron mesh particle size; iii) one or more amino resin in an amount of no more than 49 wt. %, based on the binder composition solids; and iv) one or more reducing sugar; wherein the composite material comprises ≦40 wt. % cured or dried binder composition; and, further wherein the binder composition comprises from 51 wt. % to 95 wt. % defatted soy flour, based on the binder composition solids.

In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a composite comprising a random collection of glass or polyester fibers impregnated with an aqueous binder that includes a) 2 to 45 weight percent, based on the weight of total binder, of an emulsion (co)polymer; b) 35 to 95 weight percent, based on the weight of total binder, of defatted soy flour having a particle size of not greater than 43 μm; and c) 1 to 49 weight percent, based on the weight of the total binder, of an amino resin.

The binder may include one or more reducing sugars, one or more salts, including ammonium salts of an organic acid or bisulfite salts such as sodium bisulfite.

In yet another aspect, the composite is cured.

In another aspect, the invention is a composite comprising a random collection of glass or polyester fibers impregnated with an aqueous binder that includes a) 10 to 20 weight percent, based on the weight of total binder of a styrene-acrylic polycarboxy emulsion copolymer crosslinked with allyl methacrylate; b) 60 to 75 weight percent, based on the weight of total binder, of defatted soy flour having a particle size of not greater than 43 μm; c) 5 to 20 weight percent, based on the weight of the total binder, of a urea formaldehyde resin; d) 2 to 10 weight percent, based on the weight of the total binder, of dextrose; and e) 0.1 to 1 weight percent, based on the weight of the total binder, of sodium bisulfite or sodium metabisulfite.

This invention provides flexible composites for use in, for example, fiberglass or polyester mats for roofing shingles.

Unless otherwise indicated, any term containing parentheses refers, alternatively, to the whole term as if no parentheses were present and the term without that contained in the parentheses, and combinations of each alternative. Thus, the term (co)polymer refers to a homopolymer or copolymer. Further, (meth)acrylic refers to any of acrylic, methacrylic, and mixtures thereof.

As used herein, unless otherwise indicated, the phrase “molecular weight” refers to the weight average molecular weight (Mw) of a polymer as measured by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The system is calibrated with standards of known molecular weight and composition to correlate elution time with molecular weight. The techniques of GPC are discussed in detail in Modern Size Exclusion Chromatography, W. W. Yau, J. J Kirkland, D. D. Bly; Wiley-Interscience, 1979, and in A Guide to Materials Characterization and Chemical Analysis, J. P. Sibilia; VCH, 1988, p. 81-84. Unless otherwise indicated, molecular weights for the water soluble (co)polymers are measured using polyacrylic acid standards known in the art, and molecular weights for emulsion copolymers are measured using polystyrene standards. The molecular weights reported herein for Mw are in daltons.

As used herein, the phrase “alkyl” means any aliphatic alkyl group having one or more carbon atoms, the alkyl group including n-alkyl, s-alkyl, i-alkyl, t-alkyl groups or cyclic aliphatics containing one or more 5, 6 or seven member ring structures.

A “reducing sugar” herein is any sugar that, in alkaline solution, forms an aldehyde. This allows the sugar to act as a reducing agent.

The term “unsaturated carboxylic acid monomers” or “carboxy acid monomers” includes, for example, (meth)acrylic acid, crotonic acid, itaconic acid, 2-methyl itaconic acid, α,β-methylene glutaric acid, monoalkyl fumarates, maleic monomers; anhydrides thereof and mixtures thereof. Maleic monomers include, for example, maleic acid, 2-methyl maleic acid, monoalkyl maleates, and maleic anhydride, and substituted versions thereof.

The term “unsaturated sulfonic acid monomers”, or “sulfonic acid monomers” includes, for example, 2-(meth)acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid and para-styrene sulfonic acid.

As used herein, the term “ammonium” includes, but is not limited to, ⁺NH₄, ⁺NH₃R¹, ⁺NH₂R¹R², where R¹ and R² are each independently selected, and where R¹ and R² are selected from alkyl, cycloalkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkenyl, heterocyclyl, aryl, and heteroaryl. That is, the term “ammonium” includes “alkyl ammonium”.

As used herein, the phrase “aqueous” or “aqueous solvent” includes water and mixtures composed substantially of water and water-miscible solvents.

As used herein, “wt %”, “wt. %” or “wt. percent” means weight percent.

As used herein, the phrase “based on the total weight of binder solids” and “based on the binder composition solids” refers to weight amounts of any given ingredient in comparison to the total weight amount of all the non-water ingredients in the binder (e.g., emulsion copolymers, defatted soy binder, soluble polyacids, reducing sugar, and other formulation ingredients).

As used herein, unless otherwise indicated, the word “copolymer” includes, independently, copolymers, terpolymers, block copolymers, segmented copolymers, graft copolymers, and any mixture or combination thereof.

As used herein, the phrase “emulsion (co)polymer” refers to a (co)polymer that has been prepared by emulsion polymerization.

As used herein, the phrases “(C₃-C₁₂)—” or “(C₃-C₆)—” and the like refer to compounds containing 3 to 12 carbon atoms and 3 to 6 carbon atoms, respectively.

As used herein, mesh particle size refers to the particle size of a material that results from the sample passing through a sieve of that mesh size. For example, defatted soy flour milled so that it passes through a 43 micron mesh (325 mesh) is referred to as having a 43 micron mesh particle size.

The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonly understood by one skilled in the art. The endpoints of all ranges directed to the same component or property are inclusive of the endpoint and independently combinable.

As used herein, unless otherwise indicated, the term “viscosity” refers to viscosity as measured on a DV-III Ultra LV Brookfield viscometer at 6 rpm using spindle #31 with sample temperature maintained at a constant 25° C.

Unless otherwise indicated, the term “Protein Dispersibility Index” (PDI) refers to a means of comparing the dispersibility of a protein in water in which a sample of a soybean material is ground, mixed with a specified quantity of water, and then blended at a specific rpm for a specified time. The resulting mixture and whole soybean flour then have their protein nitrogen content measured using a combustion test, and the PDI is calculated as the percentage of the protein nitrogen concentration in the mix divided by the percentage in the whole soybean flour. A PDI of 100 therefore indicates total dispersibility of the protein present in the soy flour. The total solubility of a given flour may be less than the PDI, and is inversely proportional to the carbohydrate content. The PDI can be affected, not only by the type of soybean used, but also by manufacturing processes; for example, heat treatment has been shown to lower the PDI.

According to the present invention, defatted soy flour comprises about 51-95%, or 51-90% weight percent of the total solids in the binder, preferably 55-90%, or 55-85%, more preferably 60-85% or 60-80%, and most preferably 65-80%, or 65-75%, with the remainder being comprised primarily of one or more emulsion (co)polymer, one or more amino resin, and, optionally, one or more reducing sugar. Defatted soy flour as supplied is insoluble in water, but an aqueous dispersion can be obtained either by high shear grinding, preferably in the presence of a dispersant, or by pre-cooking or denaturing the soy protein. Suitable defatted soy flour starting materials may have PDI values of, for example, 20, 70, and 90.

Suitable defatted soy flour materials may be commercially available or they may be made from ground whole beans (including the hulls, oil, protein, carbohydrate, minerals, etc.), or meal (extracted or partially extracted). As used herein, “flour” includes within its scope defatted soy flour, soy protein concentrate (partially processed flour containing approximately 60-70% protein, less than about 0.5 wt. % oil and approximately 10-20 wt. % carbohydrate), and soy protein isolate (highly processed and substantially pure protein flour containing less than about 0.5 wt. % oil and less than about 5 wt. % carbohydrate). As used herein, the term “defatted soy flour” refers to soy material containing >20 wt. % carbohydrate, while still referring to a flour where the oil has been removed (“defatted”) to levels below 1.5 wt. %.

In the present invention, a soy flour having a mesh size of 43 microns (325 mesh) is preferred, and a mesh size of 400 or higher is most preferred. Larger particles are undesirable because the fiber mat effectively filters the large particles and captures them on the surface of the substrate. The desired particle size can be obtained by such techniques as rotapping, ball milling, hammer milling, or rotormilling. Milling techniques crush and further reduce the particle size of the as-supplied material for later use.

To provide a suitable soy-based binder, in a stable homogeneous aqueous dispersion of fine particle size defatted soy flour material at a suitable solids content (from 10% to 25% solids, or higher, in the aqueous dispersion), and at a stable viscosity that allows for facile stirring and transfer through pouring or pumping, the minimally processed grades of soy flour cannot be simply stirred into water to produce such a dispersion. The use of low shear pumps and blending mixers fail to produce commercially useful dispersions. However, suitable dispersions of useful viscosities can be achieved by high shear grinding, which may be provided by any suitable apparatus. Viscosities of approximately 1,000 cps can be attained using a high shear grinding apparatus, such as by grinding using a high shear Cowles dissolver. Other suitable high speed shear apparatus include, but are not limited to: (a) high speed shear impellers or pumps rotating at speeds in the range 1,000-3,500 rpm, preferably 2,000-3,500 rpm, (e.g. Tri-Blender by Ladish Company, Tri-Clover Division); (b) homogenizers (e.g. Oakes Mixer by Oakes Machine Corp.); and (c) high speed agitators, mixers, or turbines (e.g. the “Likwifier” turbine mixer by Lanco and the mixers and aerators by “Lightnin” Co.). Preferably, one or more water-soluble polymer dispersing species is included in the high shear grinding process to attain lower viscosity ranges of approximately 400 to 1,000 cps, preferably up to 600 cps, for the soy flour dispersions, thereby facilitating handling and mixing. Slurries of higher PDI defatted soy flours exhibit much lower viscosities when ground under high shear in the presence of such water soluble polymer dispersing species. The defatted soy flour may be prepared in the form of a slurry prior to combination with the emulsion polymer. When prepared in this manner, the viscosity of the aqueous soy flour slurry is preferably from 100 to 3,000 cps, more preferably 200 to 2,000 cps, or 200 to 1,000 cps, and even more preferably 200 to 800 cps, or 200 to 600 cps.

Water soluble polymer dispersing species may be generated from at least one anionic monomer. Some suitable anionic monomers are, for example, ethylenically unsaturated acid monomers, including, for example, ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid monomers, and sulfonic acid monomers. The water soluble polymer dispersing species may optionally include at least one cationic monomer. In some embodiments, the water soluble polymer contains at least one polymerized unit from nonionic monomers (i.e., a monomer that is neither a cationic monomer nor an anionic monomer). Some suitable nonionic monomers include, for example, ethylenically unsaturated nonionic compounds, including compounds with one or more double bond, such as olefins, substituted olefins (including, for example, vinyl halides and vinyl carboxylates), dienes, (meth)acrylates, substituted (meth)acrylates, (meth)acrylamide, substituted (meth)-acrylamides, styrene, substituted styrenes, and mixtures thereof. Further suitable water soluble polymers may be polycarboxy addition (co)polymers which contain at least two carboxylic acid groups, anhydride groups, or salts thereof. Ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids may range in amount from about 1% to 100%, by weight, based on the weight of the water soluble polymer.

The water soluble polymer dispersing species may be made by any polymerization method, including, for example, solution polymerization, bulk polymerization, heterogeneous phase polymerization (including, for example, emulsion polymerization, suspension polymerization, dispersion polymerization, and reverse-emulsion polymerization), and combinations thereof, as is known in the art. The molecular weight of such water soluble polymeric species may be controlled by the use of a chain regulator, for example, sulfur compounds, such as mercaptoethanol and dodecyl mercaptan. Typically, the amount of chain regulator, as a percentage by weight based on the total weight of all monomers used, is 20% or less, more commonly 7% or less. The molecular weight of the water soluble polymer is preferably from about 300 to about 100,000, or about 1,000 to 100,000, more preferably 1,000 to 20,000, or 2,000 to 20,000, and even more preferably from 2,000 to 5,000, or from 2,000 to 3,000. For example, the water soluble polymer may be in the form of a solution of the polycarboxy (co)polymer in an aqueous medium such as, for example, a polyacrylic acid homopolymer or an alkali-soluble resin which has been solubilized in a basic medium. Many commercial dispersants and species of similar composition can function as the water soluble polymer. The polymers used as additives in these compositions can be neutralized with a base such as NH₄OH if desired. Suitable commercial dispersants include, for example, Acumer™ and Acusol™ 420N, available from the Rohm and Haas Company (Philadelphia, Pa., USA). The one or more water-soluble polymer species may be used in amounts ranging from 0.1-5%, preferably 0.2-4%, and more preferably 0.5-3%, or 1-2%, based on the weight of the polymeric active ingredient as a percentage of the total weight of the slurry, and functions as a dispersant for the soy flour particles in reducing the viscosity of the slurry. Preferably, the stabilized aqueous soy flour slurry comprises 10-60% defatted soy flour, preferably about 20%, based on the total weight of the slurry, the aqueous slurry being formed by high shear mixing on a Cowles dissolver in the presence of 1-2% of a water soluble polymer, such as Acusol™ 420N.

Alternatively, the soybean flour may be prepared by denaturing the protein component of the soy flour, as is known to those skilled in the art, as described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,306,997. The defatted soy flour may be pre-cooked prior to mixing with the emulsion copolymer; or neutralized with base before or after mixing with the emulsion copolymer, or heated with chemical compounds which denature the protein component of the soy flour. One method for preparing the soy flour slurry includes dissolving sodium bisulfite in water, adjusting the pH to from about 6.8 to 7.1 with sodium hydroxide, heating the solution to from about 45° C. to about 55° C., adding defoamer, and adding dry soy flour under conditions effective to produce the soy slurry. Preferably, the slurry is heated to about 50° C. Addition of sodium bisulfite during preparation of soy flour slurry partially depolymerizes the soy protein by cleaving the disulfide linkages. Cleavage of disulfide bonds reduces the viscosity of the soy slurry. Maintaining the soy flour slurry at the neutral pH and 50° C. obtains a higher solubility of soy flour and avoids protein gelation. Adding defoamers reduces foaming of the soy flour slurry, making preparation of the soy flour slurry easier to handle. Preferred defoamers include cedarwood oil, Byk 024, Sigma antifoam 204, pine oil, Pamolyn 200 (linoleic acid) or similar fatty acids, including unsaturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated. Preparation of soy flour in this manner produces a slurry at a solid content as high as possible and at a viscosity manageable in the subsequent resin formulation.

The aqueous binder compositions of the present invention comprise one or more amino resin. Amino resins, such as urea formaldehyde resins, are well known and widely commercially available. They are formed, for example, from the reaction of urea and formaldehyde to form compounds containing methylol groups, which subsequently under the application of heat, with or without catalysts, react further, or condense, or cure to form polymers. The methylol groups in the resin are known to react with active hydrogen groups such as other methylol groups to form ether or methylene groups thereby forming polymeric structures. Such polymeric structures are generally brittle and nonwovens containing such resins as sole binders tend to be relatively inflexible. An example of a commercially available urea formaldehyde resin is SU-100 (Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Columbus, Ohio, USA).

The amino resin component of this invention, for example, may be at least one amino resin selected from the group consisting of melamine formaldehyde resin, urea formaldehyde resin, guanamine formaldehyde resin, benzoguanamine formaldehyde resin and aceto-guanamine formaldehyde resin, and the like, as is known in the art. Other amine-bearing materials may be used to form analogous amino resins by similar techniques, including glycoluril, thiourea, aniline, and paratoluene sulfonamide. Preferred are urea-formaldehyde (UF) resins. The amino resin may also comprise a polymer modifier, such as a (meth)acrylic (co)polymer, a polyvinylalcohol (co)polymer, a styrene-(meth)acrylic copolymer, a styrene-(meth)acrylic acid copolymer, a styrene-butadiene copolymer, a styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer, or a copolymer comprising styrene, maleic anhydride, and a (meth)acrylic acid, or a copolymer comprising styrene, maleic anhydride, and a (meth)acrylate. An example of a modified UF resin is FG-705 (Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Columbus, Ohio, USA). The amino resin component may be present at levels from 1 wt. %, based on binder composition solids, or from 5 wt. %, and may range from up to 49 wt. %, preferably up to 40 wt. %, more preferably up to 20 wt. %.

In an embodiment, the aqueous binder composition of the present invention comprises at least one reducing sugar. A reducing sugar herein is any sugar that, in alkaline solution, forms an aldehyde. This allows the sugar to act as a reducing agent, for example in a Maillard reaction with an amine source. A sugar may be a reducing sugar when its anomeric carbon (the carbon linked to two oxygen atoms) is in the free form. Sugars may occur in a chain as well as a ring structure and it is possible to have an equilibrium between these two forms. It should be noted that some keto sugars are also reducing sugars because some can be converted to an aldehyde via a series of tautomeric shifts to migrate the carbonyl to the end of the chain.

Reducing sugars include all monosaccharides, whether aldose (containing an aldehyde) or ketose (containing a ketone). Accordingly, the reducing sugar component of the present invention may be a monosaccharide in its aldose or ketose form, including a triose, a tetrose, a pentose, a hexose, or a heptose. Most disaccharides are also reducing sugars. Reducing sugars include glucose, fructose, glyceraldehydes, lactose, arabinose, xylose, and maltose. Other natural or synthetic stereoisomers or optical isomers of reducing sugars may also be useful as the reducing sugar component of the aqueous binder composition; for example, dextrose, which is one of the optical isomers of glucose. The reducing sugar component of the aqueous binder composition optionally may be substituted, for example with hydroxy, halo, alkyl, alkoxy, or other substituent groups.

Dextrose has been found to be particularly suitable. In one embodiment, a high dextrose content syrup (greater than 30% dextrose) is used as the reducing sugar component. In such syrups, the higher the dextrose content, the better; syrups with 97%, or greater, dextrose content are commercially available, for example ADM 97/71 corn syrup, from Archer Daniels Midland Company (Decatur, Ill., USA).

The reducing sugar may comprise from 3%, or from 5%, or from 7%, up to 30%, or up to 25%, or up to 20% by weight of solids as a percent of the total solids in the binder; preferably the reducing sugar comprises from 5%, or from 7%, up to 20%, or up to 15%, by weight of solids as a percent of the total solids in the binder; and most preferably from 5-15%, or 8-12%.

The emulsion (co)polymer used in the binder of the composite material may comprise, as copolymerized units, ethylenically unsaturated monomers including (meth)acrylic ester monomers such as methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, decyl acrylate, lauryl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, isodecyl methacrylate, lauryl methacrylate, hydroxyalkyl (meth)acrylate monomers such as 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxypropyl (meth)acrylate, 2-hydroxybutyl (meth)acrylate, 1-methyl-2-hydroxyethyl (meth)acrylate, and N,N-dimethylaminoethyl (meth)acrylate; as well as the related amides and nitriles, such as (meth)acrylamide or substituted (meth)acrylamides, and acrylonitrile or methacrylonitrile. Other ethylenically-unsaturated nonionic monomers which may be incorporated into the polymer include vinylaromatic compounds, such as styrene or substituted styrenes; ethylvinylbenzene, vinylnaphthalene, vinylxylenes, vinyltoluenes, and the like; butadiene; vinyl acetate, vinyl butyrate and other vinyl esters; vinyl monomers such as vinyl alcohol, vinyl ethers, vinyl chloride, vinyl benzophenone, vinylidene chloride, and the like; allyl ethers; N-vinyl pyrrolidinone; and olefins. Other suitable emulsion (co)polymers may include styrene-acrylic latexes, or all-acrylic latexes, or styrene-butadiene or styrene-acrylonitrile-butadiene latexes. The emulsion (co)polymer used in the binder of the composite material preferably comprises about 2-45%, or 5-45% weight percent of the total solids in the binder, preferably 5-40%, or 10-40%, more preferably 5-25% or 10-25%, and most preferably 15-25%.

The emulsion copolymer used in the binder of the composite material may include, as polymerized units, ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid monomers, or hydroxy monomers, such as (meth)acrylic acid and hydroxyethyl-(meth)acrylate. Acrylic acid is the preferred carboxylic acid monomer. As used herein, the term, “as polymerized units” or “as copolymerized units” refers to the repeating units formed by the polymerization of the monomer referred to. Thus, an emulsion copolymer that is said to include, as polymerized units, acrylic acid, will have the following repeating units:

In a preferred embodiment the emulsion copolymer used in the binder of the composite material includes, as copolymerized units, from 5% to 40%, or 5% to 30%, or 5% to 25%, or 5% to 15%, preferably from 10% to 30%, or 10% to 20%, or 12% to 20%, most preferably 12% to 17% or 14% to 17%, by weight based on the weight of the emulsion copolymer solids, of a carboxylic acid monomer or hydroxy monomer, such as (meth)acrylic acid and hydroxyethyl (meth)acrylate.

In one embodiment, the latex emulsion (co)polymer of this invention comprises one or more copolymerized multi-ethylenically unsaturated monomers such as, for example, allyl methacrylate (ALMA), allyl acrylate, diallyl phthalate, 1,4-butylene glycol dimethacrylate, 1,2-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate, butadiene, trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) and divinyl benzene. Of these, ALMA, divinylbenzene (DVB), diallyl phthalate, 1,4-butylene glycol dimethacrylate, and 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate are preferred. ALMA is the most preferred. The multi-ethylenically unsaturated monomer can be effectively employed at levels as low as 0.1%, by weight based on the weight of the copolymer, preferably from 0.1 to 10%, or 0.1 to 5%, more preferably from 0.1 to 4%, or 0.2 to 4%, and most preferably from 0.1 to 3%, or 0.2 to 3%, or 0.25 to 3%, or 1.0 to 3%, by weight based on the weight of the copolymer.

The polymer particles of the latex emulsion (co)polymer may optionally contain crosslinking groups that are capable of forming chemical bonds during and after drying of the aqueous polymer composition. The crosslinking groups may be present in the polymer particles as polymerized ethylenically unsaturated monomers containing pendant crosslinking groups, referred to herein as “crosslinking monomers”. Crosslinking monomers may include, for example, monomers having alkoxymethyl amide groups, such as, N-methylolacrylamide, N-methylolmethacrylamide, n-butoxymethyl acrylamide, n-butoxymethyl methacrylamide. Such monomers may be employed at levels of 0.1-10 wt. %.

Suitable chain transfer agents such as mercaptans, polymercaptans, and halogen compounds can be used in the polymerization mixture in order to moderate the molecular weight of the emulsion copolymer composition, in the amount of from 0% to 10% by weight, based on the weight of the emulsion copolymer.

Preferably, the emulsion copolymer used in this invention has a Tg of between −20° C. to 35° C., preferably −10° C. to 20° C., as measured by differential scanning calorimetry per ASTM 3418/82, midpoint temperature; cell calibration using an indium reference for temperature and enthalpy.

The emulsion copolymer used in this invention has weight average molecular weight of between 5,000 to 2,000,000, preferably between 20,000 and 1,000,000. For applications requiring high performance at elevated temperatures, the emulsion copolymer most preferably has a weight average molecular weight of 100,000 to 1,000,000, however, for some room temperature applications, the molecular weight is most preferably between 30,000 and 600,000.

The binder of this invention may further include a soluble addition (co)polymer, containing at least two carboxylic acid groups, anhydride groups, or salts thereof, referred to herein as a “polyacid”. Ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids, at a level of at least 70% by weight based on the weight of the soluble addition (co)polymer, may be used. Additional ethylenically unsaturated monomer may include acrylic ester monomers, including methyl (meth)acrylate, ethyl (meth)acrylate, butyl (meth)acrylate, 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, etc. The polyacid may have a molecular weight from about 1,000 to 150,000, and may be used at a level from 0%-30% by weight based on the total weight of solids of the emulsion copolymer.

In one embodiment of the invention, the composition further contains at least one low molecular weight polybasic carboxylic acid, anhydride or salt thereof having a molecular weight of 1000 or less, preferably 500 or less, and most preferably 200 or less. “Polybasic” means having at least two reactive acid or anhydride functional groups. Examples of suitable low molecular weight polybasic carboxylic acids and anhydrides include, for example, maleic acid, maleic anhydride, fumaric acid, succinic acid, succinic anhydride, sebacic acid, azelaic acid, adipic acid, citric acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, itaconic acid, trimellitic acid, hemimellitic acid, trimesic acid, tricarballytic acid, 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid, pyromellitic acid, oligomers of carboxylic acid, and the like. When used, preferably, the low molecular weight polybasic carboxylic acid, anhydride or salt thereof is pre-cooked with the soy or lignosulfonate, prior to mixing with the emulsion copolymer. Most preferably, citric acid is used as the polybasic acid.

In another embodiment of this invention, the binder composition further comprises constituents for preserving the soy flour such as ascorbic acid, citric acid, or salts thereof; other preservatives may include sodium or potassium carbonate, sulfite, bisulfite or metabisulfite or combinations thereof.

In another embodiment of this invention, the binder composition further comprises one or more crosslinking agent. The crosslinking agent may be added at a level of 0.3 to 100 equivalents based on equivalents of acid of the emulsion copolymer, and may be selected from, for example, polyols, polyamines or metal ions, where the polyol contains two or more hydroxy groups, and the polyamine contains two or more amine groups. Species containing both hydroxy and amine functionality can also be used. Suitable crosslinkers include glycerol, glycerol derivatives, diethanolamine, triethanolamine, pentaerythritol, hydroxy alkyl urea, urea, oxazoline, polyvinyl alcohol, as well as metal ions such as ions of zirconium or zinc. The compositions should not include hydroxyalkylamides.

In yet another embodiment of this invention, the binder composition comprises a phosphorous-containing accelerator such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,136,916. Preferably, the accelerator is selected from the group consisting of sodium hypophosphite, sodium phosphite, or a mixture thereof. The phosphorous-containing accelerator can also be an oligomer bearing phosphorous-containing groups such as, for example, an oligomer of acrylic acid formed in the presence of sodium hypophosphite by addition polymerization, but a separate compound from any soluble polyacid polymer serving as part of the binder of the curable composition of the present invention. Amounts of the one or more phosphorous-containing accelerator may range from 0 wt. % to 40 wt. %, based on the total weight of binder solids (combined soy, emulsion copolymer, and reducing sugar solids), such as 0.1 wt. % or more, and up to 25 wt. %, or up to 20 wt. %, or, preferably, up to 15 wt. %, and, more preferably, up to 12 wt. %, all wt. % based on the total weight of binder solids. When the phosphorous-containing accelerator comprises part of an addition (co)polymer or (co)oligomer, the wt. % of the phosphorous-containing accelerator is determined by wt % of the accelerator charged to the reactor as a fraction of the total solids. Other catalyst systems optionally may be used, such as Lewis acids or bases.

In yet still another embodiment, the curable compositions may optionally contain one or more strong acids, wherein the strong acid has a pKa of ≦3.0. The composition may contain up to 0.2 equivalents of a strong acid, relative to the equivalents of total carboxylic acid from the emulsion polymer and the optional soluble polymer, such as from 0.01 to 0.18 equivalents. The strong acid may be a mineral acid, such as, for example, sulfuric acid, or an organic acid, such as, for example, a sulfonic acid. Mineral acids are preferred. The amount of acid, and the method of addition, is regulated such that the emulsion copolymer is not coagulated or otherwise adversely affected.

In an embodiment, the curable compositions comprise a thermally generated acid catalyst. Ammonium salts of inorganic acids may be suitable; for example, ammonium salts of sulfuric acid, or nitric acid, or hydrochloric acid, or phosphoric acid, or phosphorous acid among others. Such salts may be mono-basic, or dibasic, or polybasic depending on the acid. For example, phosphoric acid (H₃PO₄) can have three acidic protons. Suitable examples include ammonium sulfate, ammonium persulfate, ammonium chloride, ammonium nitrate, ammonium phosphate, ammonium hydrogen phosphate, ammonium para-toluene sulfonate, and ammonium naphthalene disulfonate. Such species may be added to the formulation. The term “ammonium” includes “alkyl ammonium”. The ammonium salt may be present at a level of 1-10 weight percent based on solids as a percentage of the total solids in the binder. Preferably, the ammonium salt is present at a level of from 1%, or from 2%, up to a level of 10%, or up to 8%; and, most preferably, is at a level of from 2% up to 5% based on solids as a percentage of the total solids in the binder.

Alternatively, the thermally generated acid may be incorporated as a functional group within one of the binder components; for example, the emulsion polymer may comprise one or more monomer units which include an acid functional group that may be liberated from the polymer during the cure of the composite. Monomers of this type include 2-acrylamido-2-propane sulfonic acid (AMPS), para-styrene sulfonic acid, and other sulfonic acid monomers. The monomer of this type may be incorporated into the polymer by polymerizing the free acid form and then neutralizing with ammonia after the polymer has been formed.

In a particularly preferred embodiment, the composite material comprises a binder composition of i) approximately 51-90% by weight, preferably 60-75%, based on the total weight of binder solids, of defatted soy flour; ii) approximately 10-20% by weight of an acrylic or styrene-acrylic polycarboxy emulsion copolymer; iii) approximately 5-20% by weight of an amino resin, preferably a UF resin; and iv) optionally, approximately 2-10% by weight of a reducing sugar, such as dextrose or fructose. Optionally, the further addition of other additives, as shown in the Examples, may be advantageous. For each component, the percentage by weight is the percent weight of solids of the component as a percentage of the total weight of solids of the binder. Composite samples 2-8 of Table 14, below, are representative of this embodiment.

The binder of this invention can contain, in addition, conventional treatment components such as, for example, emulsifiers; pigments; fillers or extenders, such as lignosulfonate; anti-migration aids; curing agents; coalescents; surfactants, particularly nonionic surfactants; spreading agents; mineral oil dust suppressing agents; preservatives or biocides, such as isothiazolones, phenolics, or organic acids; plasticizers; organosilanes; anti-foaming agents such as dimethicones, silicone oils and ethoxylated nonionics; corrosion inhibitors, particularly corrosion inhibitors effective at pH<4 such as thioureas, oxalates, and chromates; colorants; antistatic agents; lubricants; waxes; anti-oxidants; coupling agents such as silanes, particularly Silquest™ A-187 (manufactured by GE Silicones—OSi Specialties, Wilton, Conn.); polymers not of the present invention; and waterproofing agents such as silicones and emulsion polymers, particularly hydrophobic emulsion polymers containing, as copolymerized units, greater than 30% by weight, based on the weight of the emulsion polymer solids, ethylenically-unsaturated acrylic monomer containing a C5 or greater alkyl group. These components may be simply admixed with the dispersed soy and emulsion (co)polymer dispersion.

The inventive composite material comprises a substrate material chosen from fibers, slivers, chips, particles, and combinations thereof, and a binder composition comprising one or more emulsion copolymer, defatted soy flour, and one or more reducing sugar. Suitable fibers may be chosen from natural fibers (e.g., sisal, jute, hemp, flax, cotton, coconut fibers, banana fibers); animal fibers (e.g., wool, hair); plastic fibers (e.g., polypropylene fibers, polyethylene fibers, polyvinyl chloride fibers, polyester fibers, such as rayon, polyamide fibers, polyacrylonitrile fibers, polylactic acid fibers, polycaprolactone fibers, and bi-component fiber comprising two or more fiber-forming polymers such as polypropylene and polyethylene terephthalate); glass fibers; glass wool; mineral fibers; mineral wool; synthetic inorganic fibers (e.g., aramid fibers, carbon fibers); and combinations thereof. In some embodiments of the invention, the substrate material is selected from the group consisting of polyester mat, glass reinforcing mat, or microglass based substrate material. Preferably, the fibers are glass fibers or polyester fibers.

In one embodiment of the present invention, the fibers are chosen from heat resistant fibers, such as mineral fibers, aramid fibers, ceramic fibers, metal fibers, carbon fibers, polyimide fibers, polyester fibers, glass fibers, glass wool, mineral wool and combinations thereof. Heat-resistant non-wovens may also contain fibers which are not in themselves heat-resistant such as, for example, nylon fibers, and superabsorbent fibers, in so far as or in amounts such that they do not materially adversely affect the performance of the substrate. Suitable fibers, slivers, chips, particles or particulate matter and combinations thereof, may be chosen from any comprised of metal, metal oxides, plastic, minerals, glass, paper, cardboard, and combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the fibers, slivers, chips, particles or particulate matter and combinations thereof are heat resistant. In another embodiment, methods of the present invention comprise: treating a substrate with a wet binder composition, followed by removing excess binder composition from the substrate, and curing or drying the binder composition on the substrate. The binder can be applied to the substrate by any suitable means including, for example, air or airless spraying, padding, saturating, roll coating, curtain coating, beater deposition, coagulation, or dip and squeeze application. To remove excess binder, the resultant saturated wet web may be run over one or more vacuum boxes to remove enough binder to achieve the desired binder content in the mat. Preferably, the binder is applied to the web on a moving screen. The binder level in the inventive mats can range from about 10 to about 40 wt. percent of the finished dry mat, preferably about 15 to about 30 wt. percent and, most preferably, from about 20 to about 30 wt. percent, such as about 25+/−3 wt. percent. The binder composition is curable or dried by the application of heat.

The binders of this invention are useful to bind non-woven webs, among other things. “Non-woven web(s)” refers to any article or sheet-like form made from natural and/or synthetic fibers, including porous films prepared by the action of chemical or mechanical processing (e.g., apertured films), paper and paper products. One skilled in the art understands that formation of some order occurs during the web forming process (primarily in the machine direction). Manufacturing processes for making non-woven webs are well known in the art. These include, for example, wet-laid, air-laid (dry laid), spunbond, spunlace, meltblown and needle punch. Particularly suitable webs will have a base weight (i.e., the weight of the web before any coating or treatments are applied) of less than about 100 grams per square meter (gsm). In another aspect the webs will have a base weight of less than about 20 gsm.

The soy flour may be slurried in water and mixed with other binder ingredients and then heated or cooked before application onto the substrate, and any other binder ingredients not added to the slurry during this heating or cooking process may be either mixed with the heated or cooked soy flour slurry before or after application of the soy binder to the substrate. Preferably, a jet cooker is employed where the soy is cooked and spray-dried onto the substrate.

In drying (if applied in aqueous form) and curing the binder compositions, the duration, and temperature of heating, will affect the rate of drying and the ease of processing or handling the treated substrate, as well as the property development of the resulting composite. Suitable heat treatment at 100° C. or more, and up to 400° C., may be maintained for from 3 seconds to 15 minutes. Preferably, heat treatment temperatures range 150° C. or higher; such preferred heat treatment temperatures may range up to 225° C., or, more preferably, up to 200° C. or, when using one or more phosphorous-containing accelerator, up to 150° C.

Drying and curing can be done in two or more distinct steps, if desired. For example, the curable composition can be first heated at temperatures and for times sufficient to substantially dry, but not to substantially cure the composition, followed by heating for a second time, at higher temperatures and/or for longer periods of time, to effect curing. Such procedures, referred to as “B-staging,” can be used to provide binder-treated non-wovens, for example, in roll form, which can be cured later, with or without forming or molding into a particular configuration, concurrent with the curing process.

Some non-woven fabrics are used at temperatures substantially higher than ambient temperature such as, for example, glass fiber-containing non-woven fabrics which are impregnated with a hot asphaltic composition pursuant to making roofing shingles or roll roofing material. When a non-woven fabric is contacted with a hot asphaltic composition at temperatures of from 150° C. to 250° C., the non-woven fabric can sag, shrink, or otherwise become distorted. Therefore, non-woven fabrics which incorporate a curable composition should substantially retain the properties contributed by the cured aqueous binder composition such as, for example, tensile strength. In addition, the cured composition should not substantially detract from essential non-woven fabric characteristics, as would be the case, for example, if the cured composition were too rigid or brittle or became sticky under processing conditions. The composites described herein find utility in many varied applications, particularly in glass mats for roofing shingles and glass mats for flooring.

EXAMPLES

These examples illustrate specific binder compositions of this invention and ones that compare to such compositions.

The following abbreviations are used in the Examples:

-   SLS—sodium lauryl sulfate -   MMA—methyl methacrylate -   BA—butyl acrylate -   EA—ethyl acrylate -   ALMA—allyl methacrylate -   AA—acrylic acid -   MAA—methacrylic acid -   MOA—methylol acrylamide -   STY—styrene -   DI water—deionized water

The preparations and test procedures are carried out at room temperature and standard pressure unless otherwise indicated.

Examples 1-6 Emulsion Copolymer Synthesis

A 5-liter round-bottom flask equipped with a paddle stirrer, thermocouple, nitrogen inlet, and reflux condenser was charged with 876.4 grams of deionized water, 24.2 grams of sodium hypophosphite monohydrate, 28.5 grams of a sodium lauryl ether sulfate surfactant solution (30%), 3.1 grams of sodium hydroxide, and 0.058 grams of an inhibitor. The mixture was heated to 79° C.

For Example 1, a monomer emulsion was prepared using 459.7 grams of deionized water, 89.2 grams of a sodium lauryl ether sulfate surfactant solution (30%), 553.9 grams of butyl acrylate, 969.7 grams of styrene, and 268.9 grams of acrylic acid. A 97.0 gram aliquot of this monomer emulsion was added to the reaction flask, with stirring, followed by a solution of 7.4 grams of ammonium persulfate dissolved in 33.3 grams of deionized water. After an exotherm and while maintaining a reaction temperature of 85° C., the monomer emulsion and a separate solution of 7.4 grams of ammonium persulfate in 156.9 grams of deionized water were gradually added over a total time of 130 minutes. After these additions were complete a solution of 42.6 grams of sodium hydroxide dissolved in 397.4 grams deionized water was added. A solution of 0.022 grams of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate in 4.8 grams deionized water and a solution of 0.022 grams of ethylene diamine tetraacetate, tetra sodium salt, dissolved in 4.8 grams of deionized water was added to the reaction mixture. A solution of 7.9 grams of aqueous tert-butylhydroperoxide (70%) diluted with 31.2 grams deionized water and a solution of 5.3 grams of sodium bisulfite dissolved in 62.8 grams of deionized water were gradually added to the reaction mixture. After a 15 minute hold, a solution of 7.9 grams of aqueous tert-butylhydroperoxide (70%) diluted with 31.2 grams deionized water and a solution of 5.3 grams of sodium bisulfite dissolved in 62.8 grams of deionized water were gradually added to the reaction mixture. After addition of these solutions was complete, 47.6 grams of deionized water was added, and the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature. When the reaction mixture was cool, a biocide was added and the latex was filtered through a 100 mesh sieve. Examples 2-6 followed the same procedure, but with the monomer emulsions prepared as shown in Table 1.

The resulting latexes had a solids content of roughly 46.0%. The emulsion copolymers of Example 1-6 had Tg as shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Monomer Emulsion Recipes for Latex Samples 1-6 (weights in grams), and Copolymer Tg Example Example Example Example Example Example 1 2 3 4 5 6 Deionized water 459.7 510.0 456.8 456.8 456.8 510.0 Sodium lauryl ether 89.2 90.7 88.7 88.6 113.4 90.7 sulfate surfactant (30%) Butyl acrylate 553.9 953.3 1072.3 1072.3 1021.5 948.7 Styrene 969.7 596.1 423.9 388.3 715.13 575.0 Acrylic acid 268.9 273.3 267.2 267.2 26.72 32.1 Allyl methacrylate 0.0 0.0 17.8 53.4 17.81 18.1 Copolymer Tg (° C.) 55 20 10 10 10 10

Example 7 Emulsion Copolymer Synthesis

A 2-liter, four necked round bottom flask, equipped with a condenser, thermocouple and overhead stirring, was loaded with a mixture of 405.0 g of deionized water, 105.0 g of acrylic latex of particle diameter 58 nm and 3.0 g of ammonium persulfate at 85° C. A monomer emulsion was prepared using 125.0 grams of deionized water, 20.0 grams of a sodium lauryl ether sulfate surfactant solution (30%), 258.0 grams of butyl acrylate, 282.0 grams of methyl methacrylate, and 60.0 grams of acrylic acid. With the initial charge stirring at 85° C. the monomer emulsion and a solution of 3.0 g of ammonium persulfate in 66.0 g of deionized water were gradually added to the reaction flask over 120 minutes while maintaining the temperature at 85-87° C. After the addition of the monomer emulsion and ammonium persulfate solution was complete the reaction mixture was held at 85° C. for 15 minutes. The reaction flask was then cooled to 70° C. A solution of 1.40 g of 0.15% ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (aq.) was added with 10.0 g of deionized water. As the reaction mixture cooled a solution, of 1.0 g of isoascorbic acid in 10.0 g of deionized water and a solution of 1.40 g of tert-butyl hydroperoxide (70%) in 10.0 g of deionized water gradually added over 30 minutes. The reaction mixture was then allowed to cool to below 30° C. and was filtered. The resulting latex had a solids content of approximately 46% and the copolymer had a Tg of 30° C.

Example 8 Preparation of Aqueous Admixture of Urea Formaldehyde (UF) Resin and Latex Emulsion Polymer

The comparative Sample 23, in Table 2 and 3 below, is an aqueous admixture of UF resin FG-472× as a majority component and a latex emulsion copolymer Polymer B (Table 2), as follows: an aqueous admixture with a UF/latex blend weight ratio of 9:1, at 20% solids, i.e. 9 weight parts UF resin solids per 1 part latex solids in 40 parts of water, is prepared.

In Table 2 and 3 below, comparative binders Samples 2-4 comprise UF resin alone (SU-100 or FG-472X, from Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Columbus, Ohio, USA). These control samples demonstrate the properties of the UF resin without any latex polymer modifier.

Example 9 Preparation of Aqueous Slurry of Defatted Soy Flour

A stable aqueous soy flour slurry comprising 20% defatted soy flour, based on the total weight of the slurry, is used in Examples 13-14 unless otherwise indicated. The aqueous soy flour slurry used herein employs a soy flour of particle size equal to or smaller than that corresponding to 43 micron mesh particle size (325 mesh), and the slurry is formed by high shear mixing on a Cowles dissolver in the presence of 1-2%, based on the weight of the polymeric active ingredient as a percentage of the total weight of the slurry, of a water soluble polymer, such as Acusol™ 420N. The latter is available from the Rohm and Haas Company (Philadelphia, Pa., USA). Acusol™ is a trademark of the Rohm and Haas Company (Philadelphia, Pa., USA). This type of slurry is stable to settling, has a viscosity that is convenient for use, approximately 400-600 cps, and has minimal viscosity drift.

Example 10 Procedure for Denaturing Defatted Soy Flour

An aqueous slurry of defatted soybean flour, which contains about 54 percent protein, 30 percent carbohydrates, 6 percent ash, and 10 percent moisture, was prepared by dissolving in 250 ml water 1.25 g sodium bisulfite (NaHSO₃) for each 100 grams of moisture-free soy flour to be added. The pH was then adjusted to neutral with 50% aqueous sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution. The solution was heated to and maintained at 50° C., followed by the addition of 1.0 g Byk 024, available from BYK Chemie USA (Wallingford, Conn., USA). Subsequently, 100 grams of dry soy flour was slowly added with vigorous stirring, resulting in a viscous but smooth and homogenous slurry. Again, the soy flour used has a particle size equal to or smaller than that corresponding to 43 micron mesh particle size (325 mesh).

Alternative methods to denature the soy protein were explored, using sodium hydroxide solution alone, or using sodium carbonate (see Table 2). However, the combination of sodium hydroxide and sodium bisulfite is preferred for ease of handling.

For the embodiment that contemplates addition of a polybasic carboxylic acid, anhydride or salt thereof, anhydrous citric acid (11.1 grams) is weighed into the same container along with the defatted soy flour (100.0 grams), and the dry mixture is then added to the stirring water secured in the heated water bath. The procedure is otherwise as described above. This embodiment can also be adapted for use with the aqueous soy flour slurry described in Example 9 above, employing the procedure and corresponding ratio of polybasic carboxylic acid (or anhydride, or salt thereof) used therein.

Example 11 Glass Mat Preparation Procedure and Test Procedures

To prepare the mats used in the examples that follow, glass fiber non-woven handsheets are prepared with Johns Manville 137 Standard, 3.2 cm (1¼ inch) length, sized glass chop using approximately 7.6 grams of glass fiber per sheet (0.82 kg per 9.3 square meters; 1.8 pounds per 100 square feet). The glass fiber is dispersed in water using SUPERFLOC™ A-1883 RS (Cytec Industries Incorporated, West Paterson, N.J., USA), an anionic polyacrylamide water-in-oil emulsion, and RHODAMEEN™ VP-532 SPB (Rhodia Chemical Company, Cranbury, N.J., USA), an ethoxylated fatty amine cationic dispersing agent. Handsheets are formed in a Williams (Williams Apparatus Company, Watertown, N.Y., USA) handsheet mold. The wet sheets are transferred to a vacuum station and de-watered. The aqueous binder compositions described below are prepared and each is applied to a de-watered sheet and the excess is vacuumed off. The sheets are dried/cured in a forced air oven for 2½ minutes at 200° C. The binder amount on the samples is 21% LOI (loss on ignition).

Determination of LOI (Loss On Ignition)

A 6.4 cm by 7.6 cm (2.5 inch by 3 inch) piece of dried/cured fiberglass mat was cut. The sample was weighed and then placed in a muffle furnace at 650° C. for 2 minutes. The sample was removed and then reweighed. % LOI was calculated using the equation: %LOI=(weight before burning−weight after burning)×100/weight before burning. Tensile Strength Testing

Handsheets are cut into 2.54 cm by 12.7 cm (1 inch by 5 inch) strips for tensile testing and cut for tear testing. Tensile testing is performed on seven strips from each sample using a Thwing-Albert Intellect 500 tensile tester (Thwing-Albert Instrument Co., West Berlin, N.J., USA) with a 90.7 kg (200 lb.) cell, 2.54 cm/min (1 inch/min) jaw speed, 20% sensitivity, and a 7.6 cm (3 inch) gap. Dry tensile is performed on the prepared strips. Hot/Wet tensile strength testing was performed after soaking strips for 10 minutes in 85° C. water and then testing immediately after removal of the strips, while they were still wet. Hot/Dry tensile testing was performed on the prepared strips using an Instron 4201 tensile tester manufactured by Instron, headquartered in Norwood, Mass.) equipped with a 1 kN load cell and an oven chamber encasing the jaws with a temperature range capability of −100 to 400° F. (−73° C. to 204° C.). The oven chamber of the tensile tester was pre-heated to 302° F. (150° C.) prior to testing. Once pre-heated, the strips were placed in the jaws and the oven chamber was closed and equilibrated back to 302° F. (150° C.). The samples were then pulled apart at a crosshead speed of 2.54 cm/min (1 inch/min) with a 7.6 cm (3 inch) gap. All tensile values are reported in Newtons (N).

Elmendorf Tear Strength Testing

Elmendorf tear strength is determined on cut samples of dried/cured handsheet which are 6.4 cm by 7.6 cm (2.5 inches by 3 inches). A single ply sample is placed in a Thwing-Albert Tear Tester with a 1600 g tear arm. The sample is notched with a 1.9 cm (0.75 inch) cut and the arm is released. The tear strength is recorded in grams (grams force).

Example 12 Rapid Screening Test Method

Binder formulations were rapid tested by applying to pre-formed glass fiber mats (Dura-Glass® Unbonded HEC Mat 3/4K117 from Johns Manville). The binder is made up to bath solids, typically 8%-13%, and poured in a stainless steel tray; the pre-formed glass fiber mat is cut into a sheet measuring 28 cm by 33 cm (11″ by 13″). The pre-formed mat is then immersed in the binder bath just under the surface until completely wetted with the binder. The soaked mat is then transferred to the vacuum station and the excess binder vacuumed in a similar manner to hand sheets described earlier. The mat is then cured and tested as described in the hand sheet preparation method described previously.

Only the compositions and data presented in Tables 2 and 3 are studied by the rapid screening test method described here. All other compositions and data are prepared and tested as described in Example 11.

Example 13 Comparison of Soy Composites by Rapid Screening Test

The samples in Tables 2 and 3 were prepared by the rapid screening test method of Example 12.

TABLE 2 Composition and Preparation of Binder Component of the Composites Used in Rapid Screening Test Sample No. Binder¹ Additive² Preparation³ Cure Conditions Modifier⁴ 1 Starch flour — starch cooked 200° C., 3 m — 2 SU-100⁵ — — 190° C., 3 m — 3 SU-100⁵ — — 200° C., 3 m — 4 FG-472X⁵ — — 200° C., 3 m — 5 Soy 7B⁶ — soy cooked 150° C., 3 m — 6 Soy 7B NaOH, 10% soy cooked 150° C., 3 m — 7 Soy 7B Na₂CO₃, 27% soy cooked 150° C., 3 m — 8 Soy 7B NaOH, 10% — 150° C., 3 m — 9 Soy 7B NaOH, 7% soy cooked 150° C., 3 m — 10 ARBO A02⁷ — — 150° C., 3 m — 11 ARBO A02⁷ — — 165° C., 4 m — 12 ARBO S01⁷ — — 155° C., 4 m — 13 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO S01 — — 155° C., 4 m — 14 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO A02 — — 155° C., 4 m — 15 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO S01 — soy cooked 155° C., 4 m — 16 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO A02 — soy cooked 155° C., 4 m — 17 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO A02 NaOH cooked together 155° C., 4 m — 18 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO A02 — soy cooked 155° C., 4 m — 19 Soy 7B NaOH soy cooked 155° C., 4 m Polym. A (20%) 20 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO A02 NaOH soy cooked 155° C., 4 m Polym. A (20%) 21 ARBO A02 — — 155° C., 4 m Polym. A (40%) 22 Soy 7B NaOH soy cooked 155° C., 4 m Polym. B (20%) 23 FG-472X⁵ — — 200° C., 3 m Polym. B (10%) ¹20 wt. % aqueous slurry or solution. ²Where indicated, levels are based on weight percent of solid sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or sodium carbonate (Na₂CO₃) based on dry weight of soy flour; otherwise NaOH is added to achieve slurry pH of 8.0. ³All slurries were prepared by first mixing on a benchtop mechanical stirrer at high speed to achieve a stable vortex; additionally, where indicated, “soy cooked” refers to the soy slurry further heated to 65° C. for 30 minutes, “cooked together” refers to all components of the “Binder” (soy and lignosulfonate) mixed together then cooked together by heating to 65° C. for 30 minutes. ⁴The emulsion copolymer, Polymer A, is EA/MMA/(5% or less) of MOA, and Polymer B is MMA/(5% or less) of MOA and MAA. The amount of copolymer modifier is shown (in parentheses) as a weight percentage of polymer solids based on the combined soy/copolymer binder solids. ⁵SU-100 and FG-472X are commercial urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin binders available from Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Columbus, OH, USA. ⁶Soy 7B is Nutrisoy 7B, a defatted soy flour (supplied as 135 micron, equivalent to 100 mesh; 80-90 PDI), available from Archer Daniels Midland Company (Decatur, Illinois, USA), further rotapped through 43 micron (325 mesh) before use. ⁷Lignosulfonates ARBO A02 and ARBO S01 are the ammonium salt and sodium salts of lignosulfonate, respectively, obtained from Tembec (Temiscaming, Quebec, Canada).

TABLE 3 Tear Strength and Tensile Strength for Composite Samples 1-23 prepared by Rapid Screening Method Sample Tear Dry No. Binder/Modifier¹ Strength² (g) Tensile² (N) LOI 1 Starch flour 250 93.4 23% 2 SU-100 220 103.6  20% 3 SU-100 215 99.2 24% 4 FG-472X 214 98.3 24% 5 Soy 7B 436 52.5 18% 6 Soy 7B 384 95.6 22% 7 Soy 7B 383 49.4 25% 8 Soy 7B 334 83.6 19% 9 Soy 7B 386 104.1  22% 10 ARBO A02 297 30.7 19% 11 ARBO A02 238 27.1 19% 12 ARBO S01 329 44.9 17% 13 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO S01 430 59.6 20% 14 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO A02 391 64.1 24% 15 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO S01 383 67.2 22% 16 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO A02 371 67.6 23% 17 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO A02 246 46.3 21% 18 50/50 Soy 7B/ARBO A02 295 44.0 18% 19 Soy 7B/Polym. A 362 (282) 126.8 (98.8) 27% 20 Soy 7B/ARBO 378 56.9 18% A02/Polym. A 21 ARBO A02/Polym. A 280 43.1 14% 22 Soy 7B/Polym. B 282 (191) 117.0 (79.2) 31% 23 FG-472X/Polym. B 172 117.4  25% ¹The binder/modifier notations, and the additive, preparation and cure conditions, are the same as in Table 2. ²Tear and tensile data in parentheses indicate the experimental number normalized to the target LOI of 21%.

Composite Samples 1-3 (Table 2) illustrate that commercial UF resins, SU-100 and FG-472X, show similar tear and dry tensile properties when used as binders in glass mat composites, comparable to properties attained using starch flour as the binder.

Sample 5 (Soy 7B) demonstrates that the use of Soy 7B in the binder can significantly boost the tear strength of the composite (approximately double), but with significant loss in dry tensile strength (see sample 5: approximately half the tensile strength of samples 1-4). Sample 6 shows that loss in tensile strength is essentially recovered, and most of the tear strength retained, if the Soy 7B is neutralized with sodium hydroxide (e.g. Sample 6). Neutralization with sodium carbonate, however, is ineffective in recovering the loss in dry tensile strength (Sample 7).

Samples 10-12 show that composites in which lignosulfonate is the sole binder have generally low tensile strength. The use of 50/50 soy:lignosulfonate binders is explored in Samples 13-18. Although good tear strength results from this combination, the dry tensile strength is lacking compared to composites comprising current commercial UF resin binders.

Samples 19-23 show the use of an emulsion copolymer added as a minor component of the binder in soy and lignosulfonate binder systems. The data indicate that acrylic emulsion copolymers can be used as a binder modifier in these systems to obtain a favorable balance of properties.

Example 14 Mechanical Properties of Soy Composites on Glass Mat

This example, and the data in Tables 4-9, follows the procedure of Example 11.

TABLE 4 Mechanical Properties of Soy Composites Tear Tensile Sample Binder ¹ Preparation ² Modifier (g) (N) LOI 1 70 PDI ¹ Ball milled 24 hr ³ — 742 66.7 18% 2 Soy 7B ⁴ Ball milled 5 hr — 670 64.1 20% 3 Soy 7B Ball milled 5 hr Ex. 1 + TEA ⁵ 764 101.0 21% 4 Soy 7B Ball milled 5 hr SBR ⁶ 827 127.2 22% ¹ Prolia ™ 200/70 (defatted soy flour supplied as 200 mesh (74 micron) and PDI of 70 from Cargill, Inc., Minneapolis, MN), ball milled to obtain particle size of 325 (43 micron) mesh. ² Hammer milled samples of 1-4 did not make useable mats (the add-on, or LOI, is too high, and moreover, streaking occurs on the sheets due to clumped particles in the soy dispersion). Ball milling to provide a soy dispersion with low enough particle size to make suitable handsheet composites (with no streaks). ³ In sample 1, the 70 PDI ball milled sample had to be ground on the Cowles high shear mixer to break up clumps. ⁴ Nutrisoy 7B, a defatted soy flour (135 micron (100 mesh); 80-90 PDI), available from Archer Daniels Midland Company (Decatur, IL), ball milled to 43 micron (325 mesh). ⁵ Emulsion copolymer described in Example 1, at 20 wt. % of the combined soy/copolymer binder solids, additionally contains 0.65 equivalents, based on acid content of the emulsion copolymer, of triethanolamine (TEA) as a crosslinker. ⁶ A commercial styrene-butadiene resin, Dow 6620, from Dow Chemical Company (Midland, MI),

As shown in Table 4, above (Samples 1 and 2), in the absence of emulsion copolymer modifier, the two sources of soy do not result in appreciable differences in tear strength and dry tensile strength of the composite. Notably, the tensile strength is deficient in both samples. The copolymer modifier, added such that it is present in the amount of 20% of the solids of the combined soy/copolymer binder solids, greatly improves the dry tensile strength of the resulting composite (Samples 3 and 4). Comparison of Samples 2 and 3 (or 2 and 4) thus shows that the emulsion polymer can significantly improve the properties of the soy binder in glass composite mats.

TABLE 5 Effect of Glycerol as Crosslinker on Mechanical Properties of Soy Composites Tear ⁴ Tensile ⁴ Sample Binder ¹ pH ² Modifier ³ (g) (N) LOI 1 70 PDI 6.7 — 535 (509) 60.9 (58.1) 22% 2 70 PDI 6.7 2% Glycerol 569 (502) 65.4 (57.2) 24% 3 70 PDI 6.7 Ex. 1 877 (705) 142.8 (115.3) 26% 4 70 PDI 6.7 Ex. 1 + 1 eq Glycerol 800 (696) 124.1 (108.6) 24% 5 70 PDI 6.7 Ex. 1 + 0.5 eq Glycerol 935 (818) 107.2 (93.8)  24% 6 70 PDI 8.0 — 841 (729) 100.5 (88.0)  24% 7 70 PDI 8.0 — 756 (742) 85.0 (85.0) 21% 8 70 PDI 8.0 2% Glycerol 780 (745) 100.1 (95.5)  22% 9 70 PDI 8.0 Ex. 1 910 (896) 96.5 (96.5) 21% 10 70 PDI 8.0 Ex. 1 + 1 eq Glycerol 628 (610) 75.2 (71.8) 22% ¹ The soy flour is Prolia ™ 200/70 (see Table 4, footnote 1). ² In samples 1-5 the binder pH is 6.7. Samples 6-10 were adjusted to a pH of 8.0 using sodium hydroxide solution. ³ The modifier from Ex. 1 is added at 20 wt. % of the combined soy/copolymer binder solids. In Samples 4, 5, and 10, the amount of glycerol added is the number of equivalents based on equivalents of acid in the emulsion copolymer. Samples 2 and 8 are non-latex containing controls for Samples 4, 5, and 10, wherein, the amount of glycerol is 2% solids on total slurry solids, which is an equal solid weight amount to that used in the latex-containing samples. ⁴ Tear and tensile data in parentheses indicate the experimental number normalized to the target LOI of 21%.

The experimentally obtained LOI varies slightly in Table 5, such as between the data obtained at pH 6.7 and that obtained at pH 8.0. Data normalized to be equivalent to the target LOI of 21% (i.e. comparing equal binder add-on), shows that the addition of glycerol as a crosslinker, at either pH, has very little effect on the mechanical properties for the composites for which soy is the sole binder, and may even detract from tensile strength in the composites comprising the soy/copolymer binder system.

As shown in Table 5 (comparison of Samples 6 and 7 vs. Sample 1), higher pH has a positive effect on the mechanical properties of composites for which soy is the sole binder, but again detracts from tensile strength in the composites comprising the soy/copolymer binder system (compare Sample 9 vs. Sample 3).

TABLE 6 Effect of Soy Flour PDI and Slurry Processing on Mechanical Properties of Soy Composites Soy Tear Tensile Sample Binder ¹ Processing Modifier (g) (N) LOI 1 20 PDI — — 732 78.3 22% 2 20 PDI — Ex. 2 786 92.5 20% 3 20 PDI — Ex. 1 771 93.9 19% 4 20 PDI NaHSO₃/NaOH ² Ex. 1 767 88.5 20% 5 70 PDI — Ex. 7 718 91.2 20% 6 70 PDI NaHSO₃/NaOH ² Ex. 1 718 86.3 21% 7 90 PDI — Ex. 1 885 85.9 22% 8 90 PDI NaHSO₃/NaOH ² Ex. 1 1009 99.2 19% ¹ The soy flours are defatted soy flours, supplied as 74 micron particle size (200 mesh) in Samples 1-6 and 135 micron (100 mesh) in Samples 7-8, and then ball milled to 43 micron particle size (325 mesh). ² Heating soy material at 50° C. for 1 hour with sodium bisulfite (NaHSO₃) and sodium hydroxide (Na OH) as described in Example 10.

Table 6 shows that the soy/copolymer binder can produce composite materials regardless of the PDI of the starting defatted soy flour. The latter was ball milled, as described above. As shown in Sample 8, for ease of processing, the soy can be cooked with sodium bisulfate, which results in improved tear strength and tensile strength.

TABLE 7 Mechanical Properties of Copolymer Modified Soy Composites Soy Tear Tensile Sample Binder Processing Modifier (g) (N) LOI 1 SU-100 ¹ — — 511 129.9 18% 2 90 PDI/325 ² NaHSO₃/ Ex. 3 ⁴ 1182 103.6 17% NaOH ³ ¹ Commercial UF resin - see Table 2, footnote 5. ² 90PDI/325 is defatted soy flour Prolia ™ 90 flakes milled to 43 micron (325 mesh). ³ The soy was heated at 50° C. for 1 hour with sodium bisulfite and sodium hydroxide as described earlier. ⁴ The emulsion copolymer modifier is described in Example 3.

Table 7 shows the mechanical properties for a preferred embodiment of a composite of the invention and is compared to a control composite comprising a commercial UF resin as the binder.

TABLE 8 Effect of Copolymer Modifier on Mechanical Properties of Soy Composites Sample Binder Modifier Tear (g) Tensile (N) LOI 1 FG-705¹ — 454 151.2 24% 2 FG-705¹ 5% Polym. B² 656 142.3 21% 3 20 PDI³ — 535 62.3 22% 4 20 PDI³ 20% Ex. 1 877 142.3 26% ¹Commercial UF resin binder, pre-modified with a latex emulsion copolymer, available from Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Columbus, OH, USA. ²The emulsion copolymer modifier, Polymer B (see Table 2, footnote 4), is added to the UF resin such that the copolymer is 5 wt. % of the combined UF/copolymer binder solids. ³The soy flour is Prolia 200/20 (used as 43 micron mesh particle size, 325 mesh, as described above in Table 6, Footnote 1).

Sample 4 (Table 8) shows that composites comprising the modified soy binder can achieve a desirable property balance. Compared to the control composites comprising the UF resin, Sample 4 displays far superior tear strength, while approximately matching the tensile strength. Although the binder add-on is marginally high for sample 4 (also sample 1, the control), it is clear that the inventive composites provide desirable composites comparable to UF composites.

TABLE 9 Effect of Polymer Modifier Composition on Mechanical Properties of Soy Composites Sample Binder¹ Modifier² Tear (g) Tensile (N) LOI 1 90 PDI Ex. 7 850 135.7 20% 2 90 PDI Ex. 4 950 149.0 21% 3 90 PDI Ex. 3 825 149.0 20% 4 70 PDI Ex. 7 1027 131.2 18% 5 70 PDI Ex. 5 811 109.9 20% 6 70 PDI Ex. 6 936 118.8 18% 7 70 PDI 75% Ex. 5/ 657 110.3 19% 25% Aquaset 1734³ 8 SU-100⁴ — 498 154.3 23% ¹The soy flours are described above (Table 6); ²The emulsion copolymer modifiers are described in Examples 3-7. ³Commercial water soluble polyacrylic acid thermoset resin available from Rohm and Haas Company (Philadelphia, PA). ⁴SU-100 is a commercial UF resin described above (Table 2, Footnote 5).

The composites of Table 9 illustrate some preferred embodiments of the invention. The inventive compositions provide inexpensive composites that retain both flexibility and strength after cure. Compared to the control composites comprising the UF resin, Samples 1-4 display far superior tear strength, while approximately matching the tensile strength, thereby offering a more environmentally friendly product with a desirable property balance.

Example 15 Soy Composites from Aqueous Soy Compositions Comprising Reducing Sugar

Aqueous soy compositions were prepared as shown in Table 10, below, to assess the effect on mechanical properties of added reducing sugar in the polymer-modified soy composites on glass mat. In Table 10, the latex polymers (prepared by the method described for Examples 1-6) have the following compositions:

-   -   Latex A: 60.2 BA/23.8 STY/15 AA/1 ALMA. Tg=0° C.; 44.2% solids.     -   Latex B: 60.2 BA/35.8 STY/3 AA/1 ALMA. Tg=3.3° C.; 46.3% solids.     -   Latex C, 60.2 BA/36.8 STY/3 AA. Tg=2.9° C.; 45.8% solids.     -   Latex D: 52.3 BA/32.7 STY/15 AA. Tg=11.0° C.; 46.6% solids.

TABLE 10 Composition of Binder Component of Soy Composites Comprising Reducing Sugar ¹ Soy Latex ² Sugar ³ Ammonium Glycerol Sample (g) Latex (g) (g) Sulfate (g) (g) 1 100 A 56.6  0.0 0.0 0.0 2 100 A 56.6  0.0 0.0 11.1 3 100 A 56.6  0.0 4.3 0.0 4 100 A 56.6  0.0 4.3 5.0 5 100 A 56.6  5.3 0.0 0.0 6 100 A 56.6  5.3 4.3 0.0 7 100 A 56.6   11.1 ³ 4.3 5.0 8 100 A 56.6 11.1 4.3 5.0 9 100 A 56.6 11.1 4.3 0.0 10 100 D 53.6 11.1 4.3 0.0 11 100 A 56.6 11.1 4.3 0.0 12 100 C 54.6 11.1 4.3 0.0 13 100 B 54.0 11.1 4.3 0.0 ¹ Approximately 240 g of DI water was added to each formulation so that the binder solids are approximately 35%. Pamolyn 200 (linoleic acid, 0.76 g) was added to all of the formulations and functions as a defoamer. The defatted soy flour was milled to obtain particle size of 325 (43 micron) mesh and the formulation components were directly admixed using a benchtop disperser. Sodium bisulfite (1.0 g) was added to all formulations except for sample 11. ² The latex is present at 20 wt. % of polymer solids as a percentage of the combined polymer and soy solids. ³ Where present in the formulation, the sugar is dextrose, except for sample 7, which uses fructose.

The glass mat preparation and test procedures for the mechanical properties follow the methods in Example 11. The results are shown in Table 11, below.

TABLE 11 Mechanical Properties of Soy Composites Comprising Reducing Sugar ¹ Sugar Amm. Glycerol Tear Tensile Hot-Dry Hot-Wet Sample (%) ² Sulfate (%) ² (%) ² (g) (N) Tensile (N) Tensile (N) 1 — — — 927 119.3 68.7 29.1 2 — — 10%  1015 151.2 93.0 42.7 3 — 4% — 858 166.6 117.6 56.6 4 — 4% 5% 1009 161.2 129.0 71.6 5  5% — — 1041 144.7 127.8 56.6 6  5% 4% — 912 155.9 110.0 72.1 7 10% 4% 5% 964 166.6 139.3 69.2 8 10% 4% 5% 970 151.8 118.0 66.5 9 10% 4% — 950 156.2 113.0 95.2 10 10% 4% — 962 155.7 112.5 80.5 11 10% 4% — 1226 162.8 129.9 73.4 12 10% 4% — 900 142.8 101.9 82.3 13 10% 4% — 731 171.5 120.1 85.9 ¹ Binder add-on was 20% LOI +/− 2%. The tensile data is normalized for 20% LOI. ² The % of additive is shown as the weight of the additive component as a percentage of the combined weight of the soy and the additive component.

Soy compositions often fail to provide a useful level of performance in hot-wet tensile tests, as shown by sample 1 (a hot-wet tensile of approx. 29 N), which does not comprise a reducing sugar, or glycerol, or a thermally generated acid source, such as ammonium sulfate. The addition of glycerol as a sole additive has only a small effect on hot-wet tensile strength (sample 2; approx. 43 N), whereas the addition of ammonium sulfate has a larger advantageous effect on hot-wet tensile strength (sample 3; approx. 57 N), and the combination of the two shows a further significant improvement (sample 4, comprising both glycerol and ammonium sulfate; hot-wet tensile of approx. 72 N). Addition of a reducing sugar (sample 5; hot-wet tensile strength of approx. 57 N) is similarly advantageous to the effect of ammonium sulfate, and, again, the combination of the two (sample 6, comprising both dextrose and ammonium sulfate; approx. 72 N) is particularly advantageous in providing good hot-wet tensile strength. Samples 9-13 show that the property balance of the inventive soy composites may be optimized by exploring variables in the latex polymer composition. Sample 9, which excludes sodium bisulfite in the formulation, demonstrates that sodium bisulfite is not an essential component for property development; it is added for ease of handling (providing viscosity reduction).

The inventive soy composites show a good balance of mechanical properties, including significantly improved hot-dry tensile strength, and, especially, greatly improved wet-tensile strength.

Example 16 Soy Composites from Aqueous Soy Compositions Comprising an Amino Resin

Aqueous soy compositions were prepared as shown in Tables 12 and 13, below, to assess the effect on hot-dry tensile properties for glass mat composites of compositions resulting from the cold-blend addition of amino resin in the polymer-modified soy binder. In Table 12, the latex polymer A is the same latex polymer A as presented in Table 10 (prepared by the method described for Examples 1-6) with the following composition:

-   -   Latex A: 60.2 BA/23.8 STY/15 AA/1 ALMA. Tg=0° C.; 44.2% solids.

The soy compositions comprising an amino resin were formulated using two masterbatches of a soy binder, soy masterbatch (i) and soy masterbatch (ii). The masterbatches were made up as shown in Table 12, below.

TABLE 12 Composition of Soy Masterbatches ¹ Acusol Pamolyn Masterbatch Soy Latex A ² NaBS ³ Sugar ⁴ 420N 200 Sample (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (i) 150.0 84.8 1.5 8.2 3.1 0.75 (ii) 150.0 84.8 1.5 0.0 3.1 0.75 ¹ DI water was added to each formulation so that the binder solids in the masterbatches are approximately 33%. This required the addition of 350.0 g and 339.0 g of DI water in masterbatch (i) and masterbatch (ii), respectively. Pamolyn 200 (linoleic acid) functions as a defoamer. Acusol 420N is 49% solids. The defatted soy flour was milled to obtain particle size of 325 (43 micron) mesh and the formulation components were directly admixed using a benchtop disperser. ² The latex (44.2% solids) is present at 20 wt. % of polymer solids as a percentage of the combined polymer and soy solids. ³ NaBS is sodium bisulfite (100% solids). ⁴ The sugar is dextrose (100% solids).

The two masterbatch binder compositions differ only in that masterbatch (i) comprises a reducing sugar, but masterbatch (ii) does not. The soy masterbatch binders were cold blended with commercial amino resin as shown in Table 13, below.

TABLE 13 Cold Blend Formulations for Blends of Soy Masterbatch Binder and Amino Resin¹ Soy Masterbatch SU-100 FG-705 DI Water Sample (g) (g) (g) (g) 1 336.6 (i) 0.0 0.0 463.4 2 345.7 (i) 7.6 0.0 443.4 3 306.6 (i) 42.7 0.0 448.4 4 219.4 (i) 88.1 0.0 479.1 5 369.7 (i) 0.0 8.1 421.4 6 306.6 (i) 0.0 42.7 448.4 7 219.4 (i) 0.0 88.1 786.6 8  221.1 (ii) 91.7 0.0 487.3 ¹The amount of DI water was adjusted for each blend to result in a total solids level to give approximately equal add-on (20% LOI) upon application to the fiberglass mat substrate. SU-100 and FG-705 are both commercial urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin binders, supplied at 60% solids, available from Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Columbus, OH, USA. FG-705 is supplied as a pre-modified UF resin, modified with a latex emulsion copolymer.

The glass mat preparation and hot-dry tensile test procedures follow the methods in Example 11. The results are shown in Table 14, below.

TABLE 14 Hot-Dry Tensile Properties of Composites From UF-modified Soy Compositions¹ % UF Hot-Dry Tensile Sample Resin UF Resin (N) 1  0% — 105.2 2  5% SU-100 133.5 3 25% SU-100 110.0 4 49% SU-100 135.7 5  5% FG-705 109.8 6 25% FG-705 127.8 7 49% FG-705 142.9 8 49% SU-100 138.7 ¹Compositions are prepared as shown in Table 13, by blending the amount and type of UF resin shown with the soy masterbatch binder (i), except for sample 8, for which the UF resin was blended with the soy masterbatch binder (ii). The % UF resin is the weight percent of UF resin solids on soy masterbatch binder solids.

The data show that the hot-dry tensile strength of the composites formed from polymer modified soy compositions can be increased by the addition of a small amount of UF resin. The improvement is similar whether or not the polymer modified soy composition comprises a reducing sugar. 

I claim:
 1. A composite comprising a random collection of glass or polyester fibers impregnated with an aqueous binder that includes a) 2 to 45 weight percent, based on the weight of total binder, of an emulsion (co)polymer; b) 35 to 95 weight percent, based on the weight of total binder, of defatted soy flour having a particle size of not greater than 43 μm; and c) 1 to 49 weight percent, based on the weight of the total binder, of an amino resin.
 2. The composite of claim 1 wherein the defatted soy flour is denatured.
 3. The composite of claim 1 wherein the aqueous binder further comprises sodium bisulfite or sodium metabisulfite.
 4. The composite of claim 1 wherein the aqueous binder further comprises one or more ammonium salts of an inorganic acid.
 5. The composite of any of claim 1 which is cured.
 6. The composite of claim 1 wherein the emulsion (co)polymer includes carboxylic acid groups or anhydride groups and the amino resin is a urea formaldehyde resin.
 7. The composite of claim 6 wherein the emulsion (co)polymer includes, as polymerized units, from 0.1 to 5 weight percent, based on the weight of the polymer, of one or more multi-ethylenically unsaturated monomers.
 8. The composite of claim 7 wherein the multi-ethylenically unsaturated monomer is allylmethacrylate.
 9. The composite of claim 7 in which the aqueous binder further includes one or more reducing sugars.
 10. The composite of claim 9 wherein the reducing sugar is selected from the group consisting of fructose, glyceraldehydes, lactose, arabinose, maltose, glucose, dextrose, xylose, and levulose.
 11. A composite comprising a random collection of glass or polyester fibers impregnated with an aqueous binder that includes a) 10 to 20 weight percent, based on the weight of total binder of a styrene-acrylic polycarboxy emulsion copolymer crosslinked with allyl methacrylate; b) 60 to 75 weight percent, based on the weight of total binder, of defatted soy flour having a particle size of not greater than 43 μm; c) 5 to 20 weight percent, based on the weight of the total binder, of a urea formaldehyde resin; d) 2 to 10 weight percent, based on the weight of the total binder, of dextrose; and e) 0.1 to 1 weight percent, based on the weight of the total binder, of sodium bisulfite or sodium metabisulfite.
 12. The composite of claim 11 which is cured. 